Mark Gaffney on neocon-Zionist 9/11 suspects and how they did it

Mark Gaffney, author of Black 9/11: Money, Motive and Technology, joins us to discuss his new article:

9/11: A Wilderness of Mirrors and the Prince of Darkness

Mark, like so many other 9/11 researchers, is moving toward the emerging consensus: Neocon-Zionist fanatics more loyal to Greater Israel than to the USA engineered the 9/11 coup d’état. His conclusion:

“On September 11, 2001 we Americans witnessed the calculated use of terror to traumatize our nation in order to impose a neoconservative political agenda that has been a disaster for the whole world, especially the Mideast. In 2016, all of this is clear, or should be with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight. But any Americans who read the neoconservative policy papers in the 1990s, understood the extreme ideas that were being expressed, saw the future, and tried to warn the rest of us about what was coming, were no doubt either dismissed as kooks or smeared as anti-semitic.”

Read the entire article

Neocons Defend Saudi Arabia

Much of the West is focused on the latest sectarian provocations by Saudi Arabia, such as the execution of Shiite leader Sheik Nimr Baqr al-Nimr followed by the formal breaking of diplomatic relations with Iran in uber-retaliation for the attack on the kingdom’s embassy in Tehran. U.S. neoconservatives, however, are standing in support of that wellspring of expansionist Wahhabism.

It’s remarkable that just 14 years ago, neocons like Richard Perle were calling for the Bush administration to include Riyadh among the capitals on Washington’s post-9/11 target list. Now the Saud family has again become their dearest friend. No less remarkable is how those fearless defenders of Western values and democratic governance are rallying in defense of an absolute monarchy and the undisputed and deep-pocketed leader of the counter-revolution against the reformist movements of the “Arab Spring.”

Read the entire article

Beware 'Sunni-Stan': Neocons are Back and Their 'Vision' is Darker than Ever

Unable to affect much change in the region, as they once envisioned under the leadership of the likes of Richard Perle and his Project for the New American Century (PNAC), the neocons mounted a strategy predicated mostly on discrediting their administration’s lack of strategy.

In a sense the ‘Arab Spring’ invigorated the neocons, but also reminded them of their political impotence. Gone were the days of concocting foreign policies from neo-conservative think tanks such as the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP), the Center for Security Policy (CSP) and the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), of which, among others, Perle is an active member.

Read the entire article

NEOCON INSIDERS RELEASE ISIS MESSAGE ON FRENCH ATTACKS

Along with fellow neocons Richard Perle, Douglas Feith (who ran the Iraq war propaganda machine), David Wurmser and others in the Pentagon and the administration, neocon insiders advanced the principles of the “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm” document prepared in 1996 by a study group led by Perle for Benjamin Netanyahu, at the time Prime Minister of Israel.

“The document created by the Study Group on a New Israeli Strategy Toward 2000 called for overthrowing Saddam Hussein and waging a proxy war against al-Assad in Syria,” we explain in ISIS and the Plan to Balkanize the Middle East.

Read the entire article

Roots Of The Neo-Con Junta

If, as I have suggested, the neocon agenda rests more upon perpetual war than it does on "freedom, democracy and liberty", then it really doesn’t matter if the United States succeeds in its overseas adventures. As stated immediately after 911 by Donald Rumsfeld, this was to be a different kind of war, to be fought on many fronts, and over a long period of time.

The complete vision, as espoused by the Godfather of the Neocon movement Irving Kristol, is for the United States to enter a fascist renaissance of Nationalism, religion, and "a return to old fashioned values."

Richard Perle U.S. neo-con former Bush official PR flack for Gadaffi

Among those signing on for the task were the prominent neo-con Richard Perle a member of many conservative think tanks and a former BushBush official. Perle traveled to Libya twice in 2006 as a paid adviser of a Boston-based consulting firm, the Monitor Group .After he returned he met with Vice President CheneyVice President Cheney.

Laura Rozen of Politico notes that the firm named Perle a senior adviser in 2006. The purpose of Perle's travel to Libya was outlined in a series of documents released by the National Conference of the Libyan Opposiition in 2009. The travel along with other prominent thinkers and officials was to polish up Gaddafi's tarnished image. Another prominent thinker recruited was Francis Fukuyama.

The Monitor group said it charged Libya 250,000 a month for the project (3 million per year) plus expenses that were not to exceed $2.5 million. This is according to a 2006 memo sent to its client. Rebranding a tarnished leader is not cheap.